<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>detectai.media</title>
    <link>https://detectai.media/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://detectai.media/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>We test the major AI and deepfake detectors against the latest generators and report honest accuracy: what each method catches, where it fails, and what a detector score really proves.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why honest students run their own work through AI detectors</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/why-honest-students-run-their-own-work-through-ai-detectors</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/why-honest-students-run-their-own-work-through-ai-detectors</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Self-checking your own writing before you submit it is rational, but the flag tracks predictability, not authorship, so the only way to clear it is to write worse.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why schools shouldn't use AI detectors on students</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/why-schools-shouldnt-use-ai-detectors-on-students</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/why-schools-shouldnt-use-ai-detectors-on-students</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Post-hoc AI detectors are unreliable, biased against identifiable innocent students, and using them on minors inverts due process. The vendors and major institutions already concede the score is not proof.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why AI text watermarking is a bad idea</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/why-ai-text-watermarking-is-a-bad-idea</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/why-ai-text-watermarking-is-a-bad-idea</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Watermarking is the strongest AI-text detection there is, and still the wrong basis for an accusation: opt-in, cheaply scrubbed, and forgeable onto the innocent.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI text detector false positives: what the score proves</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/ai-text-detector-false-positives-what-the-score-proves</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/ai-text-detector-false-positives-what-the-score-proves</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>An AI detector score is a perplexity reading at an operating point you are not shown. It says the writing is statistically plain, not that a machine wrote it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can AI-generated text even be detected?</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/can-ai-generated-text-be-detected</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/can-ai-generated-text-be-detected</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Sometimes, but only for cooperatively watermarked text. Captured media leaves an acquisition fingerprint; text leaves none, so post-hoc detection only guesses.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Falsely accused of using AI? What to do</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/falsely-accused-of-using-ai-what-to-do</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/falsely-accused-of-using-ai-what-to-do</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A calm, evidence-led guide to contesting a false AI-writing accusation: make non-use the more plausible account and put the burden back on the accuser.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why AI text detectors falsely accuse real writers</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/why-ai-detectors-falsely-accuse-real-writers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/why-ai-detectors-falsely-accuse-real-writers</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The false positive is structural, not a tuning bug: the only signal a post-hoc detector has is low perplexity, which whole classes of innocent writers share.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are AI text detectors reliable?</title>
      <link>https://detectai.media/articles/are-ai-text-detectors-reliable</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://detectai.media/articles/are-ai-text-detectors-reliable</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The reliability ruling for AI text detectors: dependable where you own the watermark key or generation log, not reliable enough to carry any consequential decision.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
